All summer, as information about how the coronavirus affects children has trickled in, I’ve been updating a balance sheet in my head. Every study I read, every expert I talked to, was filling in columns on this sheet: reasons for and against sending my children back to school come September.
Into the con column went a study from Chicago that found children carry large amounts of virus in their noses and throats, maybe even more than adults do. Also in the con column: two South Korean studies, flawed as they were, which suggested children can spread the virus to others — and made me wonder whether my sixth-grader, at least, should stay home.
Reports from Europe hinting that it was possible to reopen schools safely dribbled onto the pro side of my ledger. But could we match those countries’ careful precautions, or their low community levels of virus?
I live in Brooklyn, where schools open after Labor Day (if they open this year at all), so my husband and I have had more time than most parents in the nation to make up our minds. We’re also privileged enough to have computers and reliable Wi-Fi for my children to learn remotely.
¿Por qué están aumentando y qué nos depara el futuro? Veinticinco países miembros de la OCDE y economías candidatas a la adhesión ya cuentan con restricciones de edad en las redes sociales, ya aprobadas o en estudio, frente a tan solo uno en 2023. Esta entrada de blog...
Si bien los populistas son conocidos por sus narrativas simplistas, se espera que los académicos aborden la complejidad. Sin embargo, un número sorprendente de libros afirma haber encontrado la clave para comprender el auge del movimiento en una sola idea o estudio....
Últimos artículos Publicado: 26-03-2026 https://doi.org/10.14201/teri. Artículos Amores que matan: debates sobre el esencialismo escolar e32701 Mariano Narodowski PDF HTML ePUB XML PDF (English) HTML (English) ePUB (English) Cerebro Tiktoniano: cognición y aprendizaje...
0 Comments