All summer, as information about how the coronavirus affects children has trickled in, I’ve been updating a balance sheet in my head. Every study I read, every expert I talked to, was filling in columns on this sheet: reasons for and against sending my children back to school come September.
Into the con column went a study from Chicago that found children carry large amounts of virus in their noses and throats, maybe even more than adults do. Also in the con column: two South Korean studies, flawed as they were, which suggested children can spread the virus to others — and made me wonder whether my sixth-grader, at least, should stay home.
Reports from Europe hinting that it was possible to reopen schools safely dribbled onto the pro side of my ledger. But could we match those countries’ careful precautions, or their low community levels of virus?
I live in Brooklyn, where schools open after Labor Day (if they open this year at all), so my husband and I have had more time than most parents in the nation to make up our minds. We’re also privileged enough to have computers and reliable Wi-Fi for my children to learn remotely.
Full International Edition (2014-22): The affiliation game of Saudi Arabian higher education & research institutions Analysing development of affiliation practices in the Highly Cited Researchers™ list from Clarivate™ between 2014-2022 At the end of March 2023, EL...
Un científico saudí que rechazó ser coautor fantasma en estudios españoles: “Debemos detener esta bufonada académica” Sakhr Alhuthali, de la Universidad Rey Abdulaziz y el Imperial College de Londres, revela desde dentro cómo funciona la trama para pagar “en privado”...
Pensar la catástrofe: sobre lo inevitable del golpe Lo inevitable terminó siendo el apego a un proyecto y a una representación -equivocada o no- de los intereses deseos de un pueblo ALFREDO JOIGNANT, 18 SEPT. 2023 - 06:30 CEST Velatón de el Estadio Nacional de Chile,...
0 Comments