All summer, as information about how the coronavirus affects children has trickled in, I’ve been updating a balance sheet in my head. Every study I read, every expert I talked to, was filling in columns on this sheet: reasons for and against sending my children back to school come September.
Into the con column went a study from Chicago that found children carry large amounts of virus in their noses and throats, maybe even more than adults do. Also in the con column: two South Korean studies, flawed as they were, which suggested children can spread the virus to others — and made me wonder whether my sixth-grader, at least, should stay home.
Reports from Europe hinting that it was possible to reopen schools safely dribbled onto the pro side of my ledger. But could we match those countries’ careful precautions, or their low community levels of virus?
I live in Brooklyn, where schools open after Labor Day (if they open this year at all), so my husband and I have had more time than most parents in the nation to make up our minds. We’re also privileged enough to have computers and reliable Wi-Fi for my children to learn remotely.
Fundación AEQUALIS entrega a MINEDUC reflexiones sobre proyecto de ley de financiamiento de la Educación Superior Con respecto al sistema de condonación de deudas, AEQUALIS considera justo lo propuesto para el CAE. Con respecto al FES, la Fundación hace siete...
Subsecretario de Educación Superior, Víctor Orellana: “El FES va a ser aprobado porque sabemos que hay un consenso social de terminar con el CAE” Roberto Gálvez 29 mar 2025 El subsecretario de Educación Superior confía en que al término del gobierno el proyecto que...
¿Se derretirán realmente las rocas con el sol antes de que Escocia cobre tasas universitarias? La famosa promesa antitasas de Alex Salmond sigue siendo inamovible. Pero tras el desastre de Dundee, que refuerza la opinión de que las universidades escocesas se...
0 Comments