All summer, as information about how the coronavirus affects children has trickled in, I’ve been updating a balance sheet in my head. Every study I read, every expert I talked to, was filling in columns on this sheet: reasons for and against sending my children back to school come September.
Into the con column went a study from Chicago that found children carry large amounts of virus in their noses and throats, maybe even more than adults do. Also in the con column: two South Korean studies, flawed as they were, which suggested children can spread the virus to others — and made me wonder whether my sixth-grader, at least, should stay home.
Reports from Europe hinting that it was possible to reopen schools safely dribbled onto the pro side of my ledger. But could we match those countries’ careful precautions, or their low community levels of virus?
I live in Brooklyn, where schools open after Labor Day (if they open this year at all), so my husband and I have had more time than most parents in the nation to make up our minds. We’re also privileged enough to have computers and reliable Wi-Fi for my children to learn remotely.
“Las universidades tienen que convertirse en agentes de transformación social” Eve Ruwoko, 22 de mayo de 2025 Las universidades deben trascender su rol convencional como proveedoras de conocimiento para convertirse en agentes de transformación social. Esto implica...
¿Podría la IA generativa mejorar el REF? La tarea de leer y calificar los miles de resultados presentados al Marco de Excelencia en Investigación del Reino Unido es notoriamente titánica. ¿Podría la IA aliviar la carga o su uso socavaría el propósito de los paneles...
La Universidad Liberal Moribunda En su nuevo libro, David Rieff lamenta la pérdida de un ideal. La reseña | Ensayo Por Robert S. Huddleston 28 de mayo de 2025 (traducción automática de Google) Ahora pocos cuestionan la disminución de la confianza pública en los...
0 Comments