All summer, as information about how the coronavirus affects children has trickled in, I’ve been updating a balance sheet in my head. Every study I read, every expert I talked to, was filling in columns on this sheet: reasons for and against sending my children back to school come September.
Into the con column went a study from Chicago that found children carry large amounts of virus in their noses and throats, maybe even more than adults do. Also in the con column: two South Korean studies, flawed as they were, which suggested children can spread the virus to others — and made me wonder whether my sixth-grader, at least, should stay home.
Reports from Europe hinting that it was possible to reopen schools safely dribbled onto the pro side of my ledger. But could we match those countries’ careful precautions, or their low community levels of virus?
I live in Brooklyn, where schools open after Labor Day (if they open this year at all), so my husband and I have had more time than most parents in the nation to make up our minds. We’re also privileged enough to have computers and reliable Wi-Fi for my children to learn remotely.
Cataldo defiende proyecto fin al CAE y destaca que no buscan consolidar solo un nuevo esquema de financiamiento Daniela Silva, 20 de noviembre de 2024 Según destacó esta jornada el ministro de Educación, el objetivo de la cartera "es robustecer la calidad de los...
Gobernanza universitaria y financiación La LOSU, como sus predecesoras, también contradice el mantra de los consejos sociales de que la universidad está alejada de la sociedad Javier Fernández, 03 oct 2024 - 05:30CEST Los Consejos sociales de las universidades...
Trump’s anti-science appointees ‘drive demonisation of scholars’ With vaccine sceptics taking top White House posts, there are concerns that attacks on scientists who counter misinformation may become more extreme Jack Grove,November 18, 2024 Researchers who have...
0 Comments